David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
I search for an ability of appellate courts to apply the law. I provide the reader with an intuitive understanding of Kenneth Arrow's Impossibility Theorem, a severe mathematical proof relevant to all decision-making processes. I show its relevance for jurisprudential theory. I show how the proof has been misunderstood and underappreciated in legal thought. I then show why appellate courts cannot apply the law: since appellate courts make decisions through a group of members casting equal votes, appellate interpretations are severely limited to certain characteristics. The Arrovian result is that judges, like any group making a decision, compromise based on the power of their subjective preferences, and not on any objective application of a law. Practically, this analysis shows the most controversial cases in law are problematic and predictably irreconcilable - if not seemingly hypocritical - but there is a mathematical and inherent reason for this. The basis for the inconsistency is not necessarily insincerity or deceit by judges, nor even some contemptible strategy by those who appoint them. Rather, institutional limitations interrupt the communal aspirations of group decision-making in our courts.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Michal Bobek, On the Application of European Law in (Not Only) the Courts of the New Member States: 'Don't Do as I Say'?
Amy E. Sloan, If You Can't Beat 'Em, Join 'Em: A Pragmatic Approach to Nonprecedential Opinions in the Federal Appellate Courts.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #591,653 of 1,789,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #423,018 of 1,789,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?