Complexly organised dynamical systems
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Open Systems and Information Dynamics 6 (3):241–302 (1999)
Both natural and engineered systems are fundamentally dynamical in nature: their defining properties are causal, and their functional capacities are causally grounded. Among dynamical systems, an interesting and important sub-class are those that are autonomous, anticipative and adaptive (AAA). Living systems, intelligent systems, sophisticated robots and social systems belong to this class, and the use of these terms has recently spread rapidly through the scientific literature. Central to understanding these dynamical systems is their complicated organisation and their consequent capacities for re- and self- organisation. But there is at present no general analysis of these capacities or of the requisite organisation involved. We define what distinguishes AAA systems from other kinds of systems by characterising their central properties in a dynamically interpreted information theory.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
C. A. Hooker (2009). Interaction and Bio-Cognitive Order. Synthese 166 (3):513 - 546.
Argyris Arnellos, Luis Emilio Bruni, Charbel Niño El-Hani & John Collier (2012). Anticipatory Functions, Digital-Analog Forms and Biosemiotics: Integrating the Tools to Model Information and Normativity in Autonomous Biological Agents. Biosemiotics 5 (3):331-367.
Franco Giorgi, Luis Emilio Bruni & Roberto Maggio (2010). Receptor Oligomerization as a Process Modulating Cellular Semiotics. Biosemiotics 3 (2):157-176.
Cliff Hooker (2013). On the Import of Constraints in Complex Dynamical Systems. Foundations of Science 18 (4):757-780.
Liam P. Dempsey & Itay Shani (2015). Three Misconceptions Concerning Strong Embodiment. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (4):827-849.
Similar books and articles
Andreas Wagner (1999). Causality in Complex Systems. Biology and Philosophy 14 (1):83-101.
Jeff Yoshimi (2011). Active Internalism and Open Dynamical Systems. Philosophical Psychology 25 (1):1 - 24.
Graham White (2000). Lewis, Causality, and Possible Worlds. Dialectica 54 (2):133–137.
Arthur B. Markman (2001). Are Dynamical Systems the Answer? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):50-51.
Matthew Botvinick (2012). Commentary: Why I Am Not a Dynamicist. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):78-83.
Frank van der Velde & Marc de Kamps (1998). Toward a Synthesis of Dynamical Systems and Classical Computation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):652-653.
Herbert Jaeger (1998). Today's Dynamical Systems Are Too Simple. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):643-644.
Hannes Leitgeb (2005). Interpreted Dynamical Systems and Qualitative Laws: From Neural Networks to Evolutionary Systems. Synthese 146 (1-2):189 - 202.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #439,779 of 1,911,323 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?