Deregulating the Genetic Supermarket: Preimplantation Screening, Future People, and the Harm Principle
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (02):242-260 (2000)
Robert Nozick, in what is surely one of the most intriguing and provocative footnotes in modern philosophical writing, referred in Anarchy,StateandUtopia to the notion of a In keeping with the central arguments of that text, his suggestion was that choices about the genetic composition of future generations should, as far as possible, be left in the hands of private individuals, and should not be determined or restricted by the state. This free market in genetic screening would meet and would possess In short, prospective parents would be allowed, to whatever extent was rendered possible by current technology, to choose the genetic traits of their future children
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Walter Glannon (2001). Genes and Future People: Philosophical Issues in Human Genetics. Westview Press.
Pierre Mallia & Henk ten Have (2003). From What Should We Protect Future Generations: Germ-Line Therapy or Genetic Screening? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (1):17-24.
S. Camporesi (2010). Choosing Deafness with PHD: An Ethical Way to Carry on a Cultural Bloodline? Cambridge Quarterly Healthcare Ethics 19 (1):86-96.
Alicia R. Ouellette, Insult to Injury: A Disability-Sensitive Response to Professor Smolensky's Call for Parental Tort Liability for Preimplantation Genetic Interventions.
Colin Gavaghan (1998). Off-the-Peg Offspring in the Genetic Supermarket. Philosophy Now 22:18-21.
David Sackris (2006). Genetic Modification and Future Generations. Macalester Journal of Philosophy 15 (1).
Robert H. Blank (1982). Public Policy Implications of Human Genetic Technology: Genetic Screening. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (4):355-374.
Joseph Kupfer (1993). The Ethics of Genetic Screening in the Workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (1):17-25.
Ruth Chadwick, Henk ten Have, Jfrgen Husted, Mairi Levitt, Tony McGleenan, Darren Shickle & Urban Wiesing (1998). Genetic Screening and Ethics: European Perspectives. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (3):255 – 273.
Janet Malek & Judith Daar (2012). The Case for a Parental Duty to Use Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Medical Benefit. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (4):3-11.
Nils Holtug (2002). The Harm Principle. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
Pierre Mallia & Henk Ten Have (2003). Can the Four Principles Help in Genetic Screening Decision-Making? Health Care Analysis 11 (2):131-140.
Jason Borenstein (2009). The Wisdom of Caution: Genetic Enhancement and Future Children. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):517-530.
Colin Gavaghan (2006). Right Problem, Wrong Solution: A Pro-Choice Response to “Expressivist” Concerns About Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (01):20-34.
Ori J. Herstein (2009). The Identity and (Legal) Rights of Future Generations. The George Washington Law Review 77:1173.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads4 ( #405,485 of 1,725,560 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,436 of 1,725,560 )
How can I increase my downloads?