Evolutionary naturalism and the objectivity of morality

Biology and Philosophy 8 (1):47-60 (1993)
We propose an objective and justifiable ethics that is contingent on the truth of evolutionary theory. We do not argue for the truth of this position, which depends on the empirical question of whether moral functions form a natural class, but for its cogency and possibility. The position we propose combines the advantages of Kantian objectivity with the explanatory and motivational advantages of moral naturalism. It avoids problems with the epistemological inaccessibility of transcendent values, while avoiding the relativism or subjectivism often associated with moral naturalism. Our position emerges out of criticisms of the contemporary sociobiological views of morality found in the writings of Richard Alexander, Michael Ruse, and Robert Richards.
Keywords Ethics  morality  naturalism  sociobiology
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    John Collier (1991). The Biology of Moral Systems. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):195-210.

    View all 16 references

    Citations of this work BETA
    Bryson Brown (2011). Ethics in Darwin's Melancholy Vision. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (1):20-29.
    Similar books and articles

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    22 ( #65,924 of 1,088,400 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #42,750 of 1,088,400 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.