From radical representations to corporeal becomings: The feminist philosophy of Lloyd, Grosz, and Gatens
Graduate studies at Western
Hypatia 15 (2):76-93 (2000)
|Abstract||: Contrasting the work of Genevieve Lloyd, Elizabeth Grosz, and Moira Gatens with the poststructuralist philosophy of Judith Butler, this paper identifies a distinctive "Australian" feminism. It argues that while Butler remains trapped by the matter/representation binary, the Spinozist turn in Lloyd and Gatens, and Grosz's work on Bergson and Deleuze, are attempts to think corporeality|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Moira Gatens (1991). Feminism and Philosophy: Perspectives on Difference and Equality. Indiana University Press.
Catherine Mary Dale (1999). A Queer Supplement: Reading Spinoza After Grosz. Hypatia 14 (1):1-12.
Sarah Donovan (2004). Book Review: Moira Gatens and Genevieve Lloyd. Collective Imaginings: Spinoza, Past and Present. New York: Routledge, 1999. [REVIEW] Hypatia 19 (2):175-177.
Genevieve Lloyd & Moira Gatens (2000). The Power of Spinoza: Feminist Conjunctions. Hypatia 15 (2):40 - 58.
Evelien Geerts, Forcefully Subverting or Reinforcing Dichotomies? Elizabeth Grosz‟s Feminist Rereading of Charles Darwin, Via the Perspectives of Jacques Derrida and Luce Irigaray.
Susan James Interviews, Genevieve Lloyd & Moira Gatens (2000). The Power of Spinoza: Feminist Conjunctions. Hypatia 15 (2):40 - 58.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #34,832 of 738,504 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,504 )
How can I increase my downloads?