Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):618-629 (2008)
|Abstract||I examine an objection against autonomy-minded liberalism sometimes made by philosophers such as John Rawls and William Galston, that it rules out ways of life which do not themselves value freedom or autonomy. This objection is incorrect, because one need not value autonomy in order to live an autonomous life. Hence autonomy-minded liberalism need not rule out such ways of life. I suggest a modified objection which does work, namely that autonomy-minded liberalism must rule out ways of life that could not develop under an autonomy-promoting education. I conclude by suggesting some reasons why autonomy-minded liberals should bite the bullet and accept this|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Archard (2008). Informed Consent: Autonomy and Self-Ownership. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (1):19-34.
John A. Teske (2011). Editorial Overview. Zygon 46 (1):105-110.
Sheila McLean (2010). Autonomy, Consent and the Law. Routledge-Cavendish.
Beate Rössler (2002). Problems with Autonomy. Hypatia 17 (4):143-162.
John Philip Christman & Joel Anderson (eds.) (2005). Autonomy and the Challenges of Liberalism: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Mark Piper (2011). The Prudential Value of Education for Autonomy. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (1):19-35.
Michele S. Moses (1997). Multicultural Education as Fostering Individual Autonomy. Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (4):373-388.
Lucas Swaine (2010). Heteronomous Citizenship: Civic Virtue and the Chains of Autonomy. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (1):73-93.
Ben Colburn (2010). Autonomy and Liberalism. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #40,509 of 722,741 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,438 of 722,741 )
How can I increase my downloads?