David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophia Mathematica 16 (3):409-420 (2008)
1.1 ContextIn the period following the demise of logicism, formalism, and intuitionism, contributors to the philosophy of mathematics have been divided. On the one hand, there are those who tend to focus on such issues as: Do mathematical entities exist? If so, what type of entities are they and how do we know about them? If not, how can we account for the role that mathematics plays in our everyday and scientific lives? Contributors to this school—let us call it the analytic school—do not, on the whole, concern themselves with careful analyses of important historical developments in mathematics. On the other hand, there are those who contribute to an historical school in the philosophy of mathematics. Contributors to this school tend to concern themselves almost exclusively with detailed historical analyses of important developments in mathematics. They are typically interested in answering questions concerning the growth of mathematical knowledge.In recent years, interest in the historical school has been growing, as has its influence on the analytic school. This book marks another stride in this direction. Oliveri aims to employ tools developed for use within the historical school to address one of the major issues investigated by the analytic school, i.e., whether we should be realists or anti-realists about mathematics. This is a laudable objective, since even a successful partial integration of these two schools would be valuable to contributors within both.1.2 Noteworthy ContributionsIn attempting a partial integration of these two schools, Oliveri makes several noteworthy contributions. The most significant is his development of a new type of argument for structural realism about mathematics. This argument exploits tools for theorizing about mathematics that were developed by Imre Lakatos  in his work on scientific research programs . It focuses attention on the progressive mathematical research program that started with …
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Chris Pincock (2007). A Role for Mathematics in the Physical Sciences. Noûs 41 (2):253-275.
Tom Baldwin (2002). The Inaugural Address: Kantian Modality: Tom Baldwin. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):1–24.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1989). Mathematical Relativism. History and Philosophy of Logic 10:53-65.
Gianluigi Oliveri (1997). Criticism and Growth of Mathematical Knowledge. Philosophia Mathematica 5 (3):228-249.
Hugly Philip & Sayward Charles (1989). Mathematical Relativism. History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (1):53-65.
Gianluigi Oliveri (2006). Mathematics as a Quasi-Empirical Science. Foundations of Science 11 (1-2):41-79.
Gianluigi Oliveri (2009). Stefano Donati. I Fondamenti Della Matematica Nel Logicismo di Bertrand Russell [the Foundations of Mathematics in the Logicism of Bertrand Russell]. Philosophia Mathematica 17 (1):109-113.
H. G. Dales & Gianluigi Oliveri (eds.) (1998). Truth in Mathematics. Oxford University Press, Usa.
Gianluigi Oliveri (1997). Mathematics. A Science of Patterns? Synthese 112 (3):379-402.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #120,994 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?