Graduate studies at Western
Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):273-288 (1997)
|Abstract||This paper (1) reviews and analyzes the positions on genetics taken in the official statements of Christian churches in the United States, together with church institutions of global status, and 2) offers suggestions about possible future responses of the churches to genetics and biotechnology.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hisao Ōtsuka (1976). Max Weber on the Spirit of Capitalism. Institute of Developing Economies.
John J. Markey (2003). Clarifying the Relationship Between the Universal and the Particular Churches Through the Philosophy of Josiah Royce. Philosophy and Theology 15 (2):299-320.
M. Harris (2002). Civil Society and the Role of Uk Churches: An Exploration. Studies in Christian Ethics 15 (2):45-59.
Jon Nilson (1993). The Unity of the Churches. Philosophy and Theology 8 (1):3-23.
Windsor Hall Roberts (1936). The Reaction of the American Protestant Churches to the Darwinian Philosophy, 1860-1900. Chicago.
Stephen Edward McMillin (2011). Faith-Based Social Services: From Communitarian to Individualistic Values. Zygon 46 (2):482-490.
R. Cole-Turner (1999). Cloning Humans From the Perspective of the Christian Churches. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):33-46.
Ian StJohn Fisher (1997). A Response: “Genes, Religion and Society: The Developing Views of the Churches”. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3).
Michael J. Reiss (1997). A Response: “Genes, Religion and Society: The Developing Views of the Churches”. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):289-292.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #292,129 of 739,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?