David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (2):197-207 (2005)
In Book I, Part I, Section VII of the Treatise, Hume sets out to settle, once and for all, the early modern controversy over abstract ideas. In order to do so, he tries to accomplish two tasks: (1) he attempts to defend an exemplar-based theory of general language and thought, and (2) he sets out to refute the rival abstraction-based account. This paper examines the successes and failures of these two projects. I argue that Hume manages to articulate a plausible theory of general ideas; indeed, a version of his account has defenders in contemporary cognitive science. But Hume fails to refute the abstraction-based account, and as a result, the early modern controversy ends in a stalemate, with both sides able to explain how we manage to speak and think in general terms. Although Hume fails to settle the controversy, he nevertheless advances it to a point from which we have yet to progress: the contemporary debate over abstract ideas in cognitive science has stalled on precisely this point.
|Keywords||hume cognitive science abstract ideas|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Edward E. Smith & L. Douglas (1981). Categories and Concepts. Harvard University Press.
David Hume (1975). Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. OUP Oxford.
David Hume (1739/1978). Treatise on Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
Don Garrett (1997). Cognition and Commitment in Hume's Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan Francis Bennett (1971). Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes. Oxford,Clarendon Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Tom Froese (2009). Hume and the Enactive Approach to Mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (1):95-133.
Similar books and articles
George S. Pappas (1977). Hume and Abstract General Ideas. Hume Studies 3 (1):17-31.
George S. Pappas (1989). Abstract General Ideas in Hume. Hume Studies 15 (2):339-352.
Michael Gill (2000). Hume’s Progressive View of Human Nature. Hume Studies 26 (1):87-108.
Walter Ott (2006). Hume on Meaning. Hume Studies 32 (2):233-252.
Ingvar Johansson (2012). Hume's Ontology. Metaphysica 13 (1):87-105.
James Baillie (2000). Hume on Morality. Routledge.
Mark Collier (2007). Why History Matters: Associations and Causal Judgment in Hume and Cognitive Science. Journal of Mind and Behavior 28 (3):175-188.
Mark Collier (2005). A New Look at Hume's Theory of Probabilistic Inference. Hume Studies 31 (1):21-36.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads104 ( #36,605 of 1,793,270 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #44,281 of 1,793,270 )
How can I increase my downloads?