How Long Can a Sentence Be and Should Anyone Care?

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):199-207 (2010)
Abstract
It is commonly assumed that natural languages, construed as sets of sentences, contain denumerably many sentences. One argument for this claim is that the sentences of a language must be recursively enumerable by a grammar, if we are to understand how a speaker-hearer could exhibit unbounded competence in a language. The paper defends this reasoning by articulating and defending a principle that excludes the construction of a sentence non-denumerably many words long
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Ernesto Napoli (2006). Negation. Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):233-252.
    Heather J. Gert (2002). The Standard Meter by Any Name is Still a Meter Long. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):50-68.
    Keith Lehrer (forthcoming). Schlick and Neurath. Grazer Philosophische Studien 16:49-61.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-01-09

    Total downloads

    4 ( #198,664 of 1,089,062 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #42,757 of 1,089,062 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.