Lotteries and the close shave principle
| Abstract | will lose. Call this fact the lottery observation. If the moral to be drawn from this.. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesPeter Baumann (2004). Lotteries and Contexts. Erkenntnis 61 (2-3):415 - 428.
Barbara Goodwin (1992). Justice by Lottery. University of Chicago Press.
William Harper, Sheldon J. Chow & Gemma Murray (2012). Bayesian Chance. Synthese 186 (2):447-474.
Rachel McKinnon (2011). Lotteries, Knowledge, and Practical Reasoning. Logos and Episteme 2 (2):225-231.
Sylvia Wenmackers & Leon Horsten (2013). Fair Infinite Lotteries. Synthese 190 (1):37-61.
Sopher & Narramore (2000). Stochastic Choice and Consistency in Decision Making Under Risk: An Experimental Study. Theory and Decision 48 (4):323-349.
Sylvia Wenmackers (2011). Philosophy of Probability: Foundations, Epistemology, and Computation. Dissertation, University of Groningen
Verna V. Gehring (1999). The American State Lottery. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (2):223-238.
Ben Saunders (2009). A Defence of Weighted Lotteries in Life Saving Cases. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (3):279 - 290.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-09-17Total downloads12 ( #93,386 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
