Moral Motivation across Ethical Theories: What Can We Learn for Designing Corporate Ethics Programs?
Journal of Business Ethics 81 (4):751 - 764 (2008)
| Abstract | In this article we discuss what are the implications for improving the design of corporate ethics programs, if we focus on the moral motivation accounts offered by main ethical theories. Virtue ethics, deontological ethics and utilitarianism offer different criteria of judgment to face moral dilemmas: Aristotle's virtues of character, Kant's categorical imperative, and Mill's greatest happiness principle are, respectively, their criteria to answer the question "What is the right thing to do?" We look at ethical theories from a different perspective: the question we ask is "Why should I do the right thing?" In other words, we deal with the problem of moral motivation, and we examine the different rationale the main ethical theories provide. We then point out the relation between moral motivation and the concept of rationality in the different approaches - is acting morally seen as an expression of rational behavior? Our analysis of moral motivation provides a useful framework to improve the understanding of the relationships between formal and informal elements of corporate ethics programs, emphasizing the importance of the latter, often overlooked in compliance-focused programs. We conclude by suggesting that the concept of moral imagination can provide a unifying approach to enhance the effectiveness of corporate ethics programs, by providing an intangible asset that supports the implementation of their formal components into management decision making. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRichard H. Guerrette (1986). Environmental Integrity and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (5):409 - 415.
Mark S. Blodgett (2011). Substantive Ethics: Integrating Law and Ethics in Corporate Ethics Programs. Journal of Business Ethics 99 (S1):39-48.
Norman E. Bowie (2004). A Kantian Perspective on the Characteristics of Ethics Programs. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):275-292.
Sergio Tenenbaum (2011). Externalism, Motivation, and Moral Knowledge. In Susana Nuccetelli & Gary Seay (eds.), Ethical Naturalism: Current Debates. Cambridge University Press.
John C. Ruhnka & Steven Weller (1990). The Ethical Implications of Corporate Records Management Practices and Some Suggested Ethical Values for Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):81 - 92.
Mark S. Schwartz (2002). A Code of Ethics for Corporatecode of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 41 (1-2):27 - 43.
Steven N. Brenner (1992). Ethics Programs and Their Dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):391-399.
Joakim Sandberg (2012). Ethics in Corporations. In Ruth Chadwick (ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, 2nd ed. Academic Press.
Jason Stansbury & Bruce Barry (2007). Ethics Programs and The Paradox of Control. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (2):239-261.
Norman E. Bowie (2005). Management Ethics. Blackwell Pub..
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads49 ( #21,725 of 549,037 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,706 of 549,037 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
