Mathematics: Truth and Fiction? Review of Mark Balaguer's
Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):336-349 (1999)
| Abstract | <span class='Hi'>Mark</span> Balaguer’s project in this book is extremely ambitious; he sets out to defend both platonism and fictionalism about mathematical entities. Moreover, Balaguer argues that at the end of the day, platonism and fictionalism are on an equal footing. Not content to leave the matter there, however, he advances the anti-metaphysical conclusion that there is no fact of the matter about the existence of mathematical objects.1 Despite the ambitious nature of this project, for the most part Balaguer does not shortchange the reader on rigor; all the main theses advanced are argued for at length and with remarkable clarity and cogency. There are, of course, gaps in the account (some of which are described below) but these should not be allowed to overshadow the sig-. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMark Colyvan & Edward N. Zalta (1999). Mathematics: Truth and Fiction? Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):336-349.
Mark Balaguer (1998). Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Greg Restall (2003). Just What is Full-Blooded Platonism? Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):82--91.
J. M. Dieterle (2000). Supervenience and Necessity: A Response to Balaguer. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (3):302-309.
Mary Leng (2002). Review: Mark Balaguer, Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. [REVIEW] Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):516-518.
Colin Cheyne (1999). Problems with Profligate Platonism. Philosophia Mathematica 7 (2):164-177.
Gabriel Rabin (2007). Full-Blooded Reference. Philosophia Mathematica 15 (3):357--365.
Mark Balaguer (2000). Reply to Dieterle. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (3):310-315.
Mark Balaguer (1999). Book Review:Naturalism in Mathematics Penelope Maddy. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 66 (3):502-.
Mark Balaguer (2002). Review: Stewart Shapiro, Thinking About Mathematics. The Philosophy of Mathematics. [REVIEW] Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):89-91.
Mark Balaguer (2001). A Theory of Mathematical Correctness and Mathematical Truth. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):87–114.
Mark Balaguer (1996). A Fictionalist Account of the Indispensable Applications of Mathematics. Philosophical Studies 83 (3):291 - 314.
Otávio Bueno (2003). Is It Possible to Nominalize Quantum Mechanics? Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1424-1436.
Otávio Bueno (2003). Is It Possible to Nominalize Quantum Mechanics? Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1424-1436.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-12-22Total downloads14 ( #83,183 of 549,551 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,551 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
