David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82:263-274 (2008)
This paper looks to revive and advance dialogue surrounding John Nijenhuis’s case against ‘existence language’ as a rendering of Aquinas’s esse. Nijenhuis presented both a semantic/grammatical case for abandoning this practice as well as a more systematic argument based on his reading of Thomist metaphysics. On one hand, I affirm the important distinction between being and existence and lend qualified support to his interpretation of the quantitiative/qualitative correlation between esse and essentia in Aquinas’s texts. On the other hand, I take issue with Nijenhuis’s relegation of exist(ence) to a second-rate ontological principle, and to this end undertake a brief historical and etymological survey, noting its emergence in Greek thought (ὑπάρχϵιν, ἥπαρξις), its translation into medieval Latin (ex(s)istere, ex(s)istentia) and thus something of the pedigree of this terminology in modern usage. I conclude with some brief remarks on the task of exegeting Aquinas vis-à-vis the revivification of contemporary metaphysical ontology in general
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Richard J. Colledge (2013). Secular Spirituality and the Hermeneutics of Ontological Gratitude. Sophia 52 (1):27-43.
Similar books and articles
Scott MacDonald (1984). The Esse/Essentia Argument in Aquinas's De Ente Et Essentia. Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (2):157-72.
Stephen L. Brock (2006). On Whether Aquinas's Ipsum Esse is “Platonism”. Review of Metaphysics 60 (2):269-303.
Anthony J. Lisska (2006). A Look at Inner Sense in Aquinas: A Long-Neglected Faculty Psychology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:1-19.
Anthony J. Lisska (2006). A Look at Inner Sense in Aquinas. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:1-19.
James B. Reichmann (2006). Scotus and Haecceitas, Aquinas and Esse. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):63-75.
Richard Cross (1996). Aquinas on Nature, Hypostasis, and the Metaphysics of the Incarnation. The Thomist 60 (2):171 - 202.
Paul Gilbert (2009). Et hoc dicimus Deum. Giornale di Metafisica 31 (3):465 - 480.
Michael B. Ewbank (2002). Of Idols, Icons, and Aquinas's Esse. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2):161-175.
Gyula Klima, Ens Multipliciter Dicitur: The Semantics and Metaphysics of Being in St. Thomas Aquinas.
John Lamont (1997). Aquinas on Divine Simplicity. The Monist 80 (4):521-538.
Derek J. Morrow (2006). Aquinas, Marion, Analogy, and Esse. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):25-42.
John Nijenhuis (1995). Existence Vs. Being. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 69 (1):89-95.
John Goheen (1940). The Problem of Matter and Form in the De Ente Et Essentia of Thomas Aquinas. Cambridge, Mass.,Harvard University Press.
Douglas K. Mikkelson (2005). Aquinas and Dōgen and Virtues. Philosophy East and West 55 (4):542-569.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads35 ( #112,226 of 1,792,869 )
Recent downloads (6 months)20 ( #39,003 of 1,792,869 )
How can I increase my downloads?