Software, Abstraction, and Ontology

The Monist 82 (1):3-19 (1999)
Abstract
This paper analyzes both philosophical and practical assumptions underlying claims for the dual nature of software, including software as a machine made of text, and software as a concrete abstraction. A related view of computer science as a branch of pure mathematics is analyzed through a comparative examination of the nature of abstraction in mathematics and computer science. The relationship between the concrete and the abstract in computer programs is then described by exploring a taxonomy of approaches borrowed from philosophy of mind
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Nurbay Irmak (2012). Software is an Abstract Artifact. Grazer Philosophische Studien 86 (1):55-72.
    Peter Suber (1988). What is Software? Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2 (2):89-119.
    Rohit Parikh (2002). Social Software. Synthese 132 (3):187 - 211.
    Odin Kroeger (2011). Why Are Software Patents so Elusive? A Platonic Approach. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 5 (1):57-70.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-01-09

    Total downloads

    4 ( #198,664 of 1,089,063 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,063 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.