David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (6):549-561 (2011)
The actions of affect are prominent in the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and can be broken down for the purposes of education into two roles. The first alludes to the history of philosophy and the ways in which affect has been used by Spinoza (Deleuze, 1992) Nietzsche (Deleuze, 1983) or Bergson (Deleuze, 1991). In this role, Deleuze reinvigorates and challenges definitions of affect that would place them into systems of understanding that could take paths to metaphysics or to becoming paradigms for capture in any further theorisation of affect. For example, scholars might attest to the use of affect as defined by Spinoza in the Ethics. Deleuze (1983, 1991, 1992) attends to the ways in which scholarly understanding of affect has been broached in order to free the idea up for empirical studies and also to show that the power of didactic language may be subsumed and subverted. The second role of affect in the work of Deleuze comes about in his first two co-authored books that he produced with Félix Guattari (Deleuze & Guattari, 1984, 1988). These publications have a distinct purpose from the scholarly work, which this article shall examine in terms of educational activism, group identities and the sociology of education. This level imbues the use of language in pedagogic acts with an intense affective resonance and the multiple traces of becoming that might be present in any teaching and learning context
|Keywords||language and educational theory affect Deleuze|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gilles Deleuze (1988). Bergsonism. Zone Books.
Zelia Gregoriou (2004). Commencing the Rhizome: Towards a Minor Philosophy of Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 36 (3):233–251.
Citations of this work BETA
Greg Thompson & Ian Cook (2012). The Logics of Good Teaching in an Audit Culture: A Deleuzian Analysis. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (3):243-258.
Similar books and articles
Jay Hetrick (2012). What is Nomad Art? A Benjaminian Reading of Deleuze's Riegl. Deleuze Studies 6 (1):27-41.
Robert T. Tally Jr (2010). Nomadography. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 5 (11):15-24.
Tom Conley (2011). Deleuze and the Filmic Diagram. Deleuze Studies 5 (2):163-176.
Jeffrey A. Bell (2008). History Undone: Towards a Deleuzo-Guattarian Philosophy of History. [REVIEW] Deleuze Studies 2 (1):109-119.
Lorenzo Chiesa (2009). Act I Deleuze on Theatre : Artaud, Beckett and Carmelo Bene. I Artaud BwO : The Uses of Artaud's To Have Done with the Judgement of God / Edward Scheer ; Expression and Affect in Kleist, Beckett and Deleuze / Anthony Uhlmann ; A Theatre of Subtractive Extinction : Bene Without Deleuze. In Laura Cull (ed.), Deleuze and Performance. Edinburgh University Press.
James Williams (2008). Gilles Deleuze and Michel Henry: Critical Contrasts in the Deduction of Life as Transcendental. Sophia 47 (3):265-279.
Jondi Keane (2009). Hyperconnectivity Through Deleuze : Indices of Affect. In Eugene W. Holland, Daniel W. Smith & Charles J. Stivale (eds.), Gilles Deleuze: Image and Text. Continuum.
Simon Choat (2009). Deleuze, Marx and the Politicisation of Philosophy. Deleuze Studies 3 (suppl):8-27.
Ronald Bogue (2003). Deleuze on Cinema. Routledge.
Added to index2009-12-25
Total downloads32 ( #59,710 of 1,140,035 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #157,514 of 1,140,035 )
How can I increase my downloads?