There is No Easy Road to Nominalism
Mind 119 (474):285-306 (2010)
| Abstract | Hartry Field has shown us a way to be nominalists: we must purge our scientific theories of quantification over abstracta and we must prove the appropriate conservativeness results. This is not a path for the faint hearted. Indeed, the substantial technical difficulties facing Field’s project have led some to explore other, easier options. Recently, Jody Azzouni, Joseph Melia, and Stephen Yablo have argued (in different ways) that it is a mistake to read our ontological commitments simply from what the quantifiers of our best scientific theories range over. In this paper, I argue that all three arguments fail and they fail for much the same reason; would-be nominalists are thus left facing Field’s hard road | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Aidan Lyon & Mark Colyvan (2008). The Explanatory Power of Phase Spaces. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):227-243.
M. Colyvan (2005). Ontological Independence as the Mark of the Real: Jody Azzouni. Deflating Existential Consequence: A Case for Nominalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. Pp. Viii + 241. ISBN 0-19-515988-. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 13 (2):216-225.
David Manley (2002). Properties and Resemblance Classes. Noûs 36 (1):75–96.
Dale Tuggy (2007). Three Roads to Open Theism. Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):28-51.
Dale Tuggy (2007). Three Roads to Open Theism. Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):28-51.
David Liggins (2012). Weaseling and the Content of Science. Mind 121 (484):997-1005.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-03-04Total downloads48 ( #22,874 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #27,255 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |

