David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:257 - 274 (1982)
The Law of Inertia plays a key role in the scheme of constructive axioms for the General Theory of Relativity. A new formulation of this law which avoids the circularity problems inherent in previous formulations is presented. The empirical status of this law and the manner in which it provides a non-conventional foundation for the Law of Motion and the definition of physical forces is established. First, quite general path structures are discussed which are not defined at the outset in terms of geodesic paths and which require for their description only the local differential topological structure. Secondly, a number of theorems are presented which serve as purely local differential topological criteria for singling out from among the general path structures the geodesic ones that represent the inertial structure of spacetime.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Marco Giovanelli (2013). Talking at Cross-Purposes: How Einstein and the Logical Empiricists Never Agreed on What They Were Disagreeing About. Synthese 190 (17):3819-3863.
Robert Alan Coleman & Herbert Korté (1995). A New Semantics for the Epistemology of Geometry II: Epistemological Completeness of Newton—Galilei and Einstein—Maxwell Theory. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 42 (2):161 - 189.
Robert Alan Coleman & Herbert Korté (1995). A New Semantics for the Epistemology of Geometry I: Modeling Spacetime Structure. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 42 (2):141 - 160.
Similar books and articles
J. Earman & M. Friedman (1973). The Meaning and Status of Newton's Law of Inertia and the Nature of Gravitational Forces. Philosophy of Science 40 (3):329-359.
Thomas J. McLaughlin (2008). Nature and Inertia. Review of Metaphysics 62 (2):251-284.
Alexander Afriat & Ermenegildo Caccese (2010). The Relativity of Inertia and Reality of Nothing. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (1):9-26.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1995). ‘Kant’s Proof of the Law of Inertia’. In H. Robinson (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress. Marquette University Press.
Carolina Sartorio (2008). Moral Inertia. Philosophical Studies 140 (1):117 - 133.
Norwood Russell Hanson (1963). The Law of Inertia: A Philosopher's Touchstone. Philosophy of Science 30 (2):107-121.
Thomas McLaughlin (2004). Local Motion and the Principle of Inertia. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):239-264.
Jason Zimba (2008). Inertia and Determinism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):417-428.
R. A. Sharpe (1964). The Logical Status of Natural Laws. Inquiry 7 (1-4):414-416.
Robert DiSalle (1992). Einstein, Newton and the Empirical Foundations of Space Time Geometry. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (3):181 – 189.
Robert Disalle (1995). Spacetime Theory as Physical Geometry. Erkenntnis 42 (3):317-337.
D. H. Mellor (1990). Laws, Chances and Properties. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):159 – 170.
Jill North (2009). The “Structure” of Physics. Journal of Philosophy 106 (2):57-88.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads11 ( #159,696 of 1,692,194 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #184,284 of 1,692,194 )
How can I increase my downloads?