David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):55-74 (2002)
Donald T. Campbell outlines an epistemological theory that attempts to be faithful to evolution through natural selection. He takes his position to be consistent with that of Karl R. Popper, whom he credits as the primary advocate of his day for natural selection epistemology. Campbell writes that neither he nor Popper want to give up the goal of objectivity or objective truth, in spite of their evolutionary epistemology. In discussing the conflict between an epistemology based on natural selection and objective truth, Campbell cites an article by the German sociologist and philosopher Georg Simmel entitled 'On a Connection of Selection Theory to Epistemology', as presenting the issue in a notably forthright manner.The present essay summarizes Simmel's article, with the purpose of clarifying, in terms that Campbell apparently finds satisfactory, the conflict that Campbell acknowledges between an evolutionary epistemology and ultimate truth; the essay then examines the responses of Campbell and Popper to Simmel's position. While Campbell and Popper acknowledge the work of Simmel, their responses suggest something less than a full consideration of Simmel's position.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Karl R. Popper (1979). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford University Press.
Richard C. Jennings (1983). Popper, Tarski and Relativism. Analysis 43 (3):118 - 123.
Susan Haack (1976). Is It True What They Say About Tarski? Philosophy 51 (197):323 - 336.
Citations of this work BETA
Cliff Hooker (2013). Georg Simmel and Naturalist Interactivist Epistemology of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):311-317.
Similar books and articles
Gary Backhaus (1998). Georg Simmel as an Eidetic Social Scientist. Sociological Theory 16 (3):260-281.
Franz M. Wuketits (1986). Evolution as a Cognition Process: Towards an Evolutionary Epistemology. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 1 (2):191-206.
Olli Pyyhtinen (2008). Ambiguous Individuality: Georg Simmel on the “Who” and the “What” of the Individual. [REVIEW] Human Studies 31 (3):279 - 298.
Paul Thagard (1980). Against Evolutionary Epistemology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:187 - 196.
Donald Campbell (1988). The Author Responds: Popper and Selection Theory. Social Epistemology 2 (4):371 – 377.
Eugenie Gatens-Robinson (1993). Why Falsification is the Wrong Paradigm for Evolutionary Epistemology: An Analysis of Hull's Selection Theory. Philosophy of Science 60 (4):535-557.
Frederic Vandenberghe (1999). Simmel and Weber as Ideal-Typical Founders of Sociology. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (4):57-80.
Wayne D. Christensen & Clifford A. Hooker (1999). The Organization of Knowledge: Beyond Campbell's Evolutionary Epistemology. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):249.
Turo-Kimmo Lehtonen & Olli Pyyhtinen (2008). On Simmel's Conception of Philosophy. Continental Philosophy Review 41 (3):301-322.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #127,241 of 1,796,321 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #347,915 of 1,796,321 )
How can I increase my downloads?