War and intention

Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):174-191 (2011)
Abstract Right intention is one of the staple criteria of traditional just war theory. In classical terms, right intention is met when a belligerent aims to achieve a just and peaceful order. I will address the problem of determining when a belligerent has satisfied the criterion of right intention. I will argue that right intention is determined by observing a belligerent's acts during and after a conflict. Intention is not merely a private mental act known ultimately only by the people who express the intentions of their governments. Rather, right intention is a communal, public act, for the observable circumstances are how intention is determined. I will demonstrate the effectiveness of this way of determining intention by concentrating on the stated intentions of the Allies before World War II and of the U.S. before the First and Second Gulf Wars. The goal of the paper is to demonstrate that the international community can check a belligerent's stated intentions both while the war is in progress and after the war has ended. I will argue that how well a belligerent conforms to the jus in bello and, when appropriate, to the jus post bellum, provide the international community with much of the information it needs to determine whether or not right intention has been met
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15027570.2011.608493
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,201
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (1999). The Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press.
G. E. M. Anscombe (1957). Intention. Harvard University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Rosemary B. Kellison (2015). Impure Agency and the Just War. Journal of Religious Ethics 43 (2):317-341.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Richard Holton (1993). Intention Detecting. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (172):298-318.
Steven J. Jensen (2010). Getting Inside the Acting Person. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):461-471.
Joe Mintoff (2004). Is an Agreement an Exchange of Intentions? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):44–67.
Raimo Tuomela (2005). We-Intentions Revisited. Philosophical Studies 125 (3):327 - 369.
Alfred R. Mele (1987). Are Intentions Self-Referential? Philosophical Studies 52 (3):309-329.
J. David Velleman (1997). How To Share An Intention. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):29 - 50.
Conor Mchugh (2014). Exercising Doxastic Freedom. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1):1-37.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

30 ( #158,667 of 1,940,983 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #149,681 of 1,940,983 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.