Philosophical Investigations 33 (1):1-23 (2010)
|Abstract||The paper reviews the grounds for relativist interpretations of Wittgenstein's later thought, especially in On Certainty . It distinguishes between factual and virtual forms of epistemic relativism and argues that, on closer inspection, Wittgenstein's notes don't support any form of relativism – let it be factual or virtual. In passing, it considers also so-called "naturalist" readings of On Certainty , which may lend support to a relativist interpretation of Wittgenstein's ideas, finds them wanting, and recommends to interpret his positive proposal in On Certainty as a form of "internal rationalism.".|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nigel Pleasants (2008). Wittgenstein, Ethics and Basic Moral Certainty. Inquiry 51 (3):241 – 267.
James Beebe (2010). Moral Relativism in Context. Noûs 44 (4):691-724.
Andy Egan (2007). Epistemic Modals, Relativism and Assertion. Philosophical Studies 133 (1):1--22.
Bob Plant (2011). Religion, Relativism, and Wittgenstein's Naturalism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (2):177 - 209.
Norman Malcolm (1988). Wittgenstein's Scepticism' in on Certainty. Inquiry 31 (3):277 – 293.
Elly Vintiadis (2006). Why Certainty is Not a Mansion. Journal of Philosophical Research 31:143-152.
Gideon Rosen (2007). The Case Against Epistemic Relativism: Reflections on Chapter 6 of Fear of Knowledge. Episteme 4 (1):10-29.
Martin Kusch (2010). Kripke's Wittgenstein, on Certainty, and Epistemic Relativism. In Daniel Whiting (ed.), The Later Wittgenstein on Language. Palgrave Macmillan.
Harold Zellner (1995). “Is Relativism Self-Defeating?”. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:287-295.
Added to index2009-09-29
Total downloads66 ( #13,616 of 549,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?