Is Evidence Knowledge?
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2):447-454 (2010)
| Abstract | We argue that if evidence were knowledge, then there wouldn’t be any Gettier cases, and justification would fail to be closed in egregious ways. But there are Gettier cases, and justification does not fail to be close in egregious ways. Therefore, evidence isn’t knowledge. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSherrilyn Roush (2007). Tracking Truth: Knowledge, Evidence, and Science. Oxford University Press.
Damien Fennell & Nancy Cartwright (forthcoming). Does Roush Show That Evidence Should Be Probable? Synthese.
Andrew Naylor (1983). Justification in Memory Knowledge. Synthese 55 (2):269 - 286.
Stephen Hetherington, Gettier Problems. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
John Turri (2012). Is Knowledge Justified True Belief? Synthese 184 (3):247-259.
Jessica Brown (2011). Thought Experiments, Intuitions and Philosophical Evidence. Dialectica 65 (4):493-516.
Elijah Chudnoff (2011). What Should a Theory of Knowledge Do? Dialectica 65 (4):561-579.
Frank Jackson (2011). On Gettier Holdouts. Mind and Language 26 (4):468-481.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads68 ( #13,280 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,653 of 556,888 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
