David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 7 (1-4):129 – 142 (1964)
This paper tries to show that although Carnap's distinction between internal and external questions in terms of a linguistic framework is philosophically important, and that although metaphysical questions are, as Carnap claims, external questions, Carnap's conclusion that all meaningful metaphysical questions are practical questions about language is not justified. This is done in three steps. First, it is argued that it is plausible to suppose that there is for languages a kind of external question other than the one kind Carnap specifies, because “language games” are like the game of chess in important ways and there seems to be such a kind of question for chess. Second, it is shown that at least some metaphysical questions can quite reasonably be interpreted as being of this kind. Third, reasons are given for rejecting Carnap's grounds for claiming that there is only one kind of external question.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
Rudolf Carnap (1947/1956). Meaning and Necessity. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Marc Alspector-Kelly (2002). Stroud's Carnap. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):276-302.
Similar books and articles
Mark Balaguer (2009). The Metaphysical Irrelevance of the Compatibilism Debate (and, More Generally, of Conceptual Analysis). Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (1):1-24.
Bruce N. Waller (1978). Carnap and Quine on the Distinction Between External and Internal Questions. Philosophical Studies 33 (3):301 - 312.
Bernardo J. Canteñs (2003). Suárez on Beings of Reason. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2):171-187.
Natalja Deng (2012). Questions About 'Internal and External Questions About God'. Religious Studies 48 (2):257-268.
Daniel Nolan (2011). The Extent of Metaphysical Necessity. Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):313-339.
Gregory Lavers (2004). Carnap, Semantics and Ontology. Erkenntnis 60 (3):295-316.
Stephen Yablo (1998). Does Ontology Rest on a Mistake? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):229 - 283.
Robin Le Poidevin (1995). Internal and External Questions About God. Religious Studies 31 (4):485 - 500.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads7 ( #149,864 of 1,089,085 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,982 of 1,089,085 )
How can I increase my downloads?