David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minds and Machines 9 (4):479-496 (1999)
Decision making is usually viewed as involving a period of thought, while the decision maker assesses options, their likely consequences, and his or her preferences, and selects the preferred option. The process ends in a terminating action. In this view errors of thought will inevitably show up as errors of action; costs of thinking are to be balanced against costs of decision errors. Fast and frugal heuristics research has shown that, in some environments, modest thought can lead to excellent action. In this paper we extend this work to situations in which action is taken after little or no thought. We show that these `highly active' or `decision cycles' processes can lead to excellent results at the cost of almost no thought. The paper examines the settings in which this effectiveness is possible, and lists a number of environmental features that are required for decision cycles to work well. Several research directions for analytical, laboratory, and field-based research are identified.
|Keywords||action-first strategies decision cycles disjointed incrementalism feedback heuristics muddling through social experimentation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael J. Shaffer (2009). Decision Theory, Intelligent Planning and Counterfactuals. Minds and Machines 19 (1):61-92.
Nathan Berg & Ulrich Hoffrage (2010). Compressed Environments: Unbounded Optimizers Should Sometimes Ignore Information. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 20 (2):259-275.
Similar books and articles
Louise Barrett & Peter Henzi (2000). Keeping It Simple, Socially. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):743-744.
José Luis Bermúdez (2000). Rationality, Logic, and Fast and Frugal Heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):744-745.
James Shanteau & Rickey P. Thomas (2000). Fast and Frugal Heuristics: What About Unfriendly Environments? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):762-763.
Alex Voorhoeve & Ken Binmore (2006). Transitivity, the Sorites Paradox, and Similarity-Based Decision-Making. Erkenntnis 64 (1):101-114.
Gerd Gigerenzer (1999). Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford University Press.
R. Duncan Luce (2000). Fast, Frugal, and Surprisingly Accurate Heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):757-758.
X. T. Wang (2000). From Simon 's Scissors for Rationality to Abc's Adaptive Toolbox. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):765-766.
Clare Harries & Mandeep K. Dhami (2000). On the Descriptive Validity and Prescriptive Utility of Fast and Frugal Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):753-754.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #170,909 of 1,692,213 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #78,120 of 1,692,213 )
How can I increase my downloads?