Erkenntnis 68 (2):187 - 190 (2008)
|Abstract||In this note, I argue that a dynamically shifted world—i.e. a world identical to our own except for a fixed constant difference in the absolute acceleration of each object—is nomically impossible in a Newtonian world populated by finitely many objects. A dynamic shift however seems to be nomically possible in a world populated by infinitely many objects, but only in a broad sense of nomic possibility.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Charles Wesley Morgan (1962). This Dynamic World. New York, Vantage Press.
Rosamund Stone Zander (2002). The Art of Possibility. Penguin Books.
Peter B. M. Vranas (2005). Do Cry Over Spilt Milk: Possibly You Can Change the Past. The Monist 88 (3):370 - 387.
Peter Vallentyne (1988). Explicating Lawhood. Philosophy of Science 55 (4):598-613.
David E. W. Fenner (2006). Environmental Aesthetics and the Dynamic Object. Ethics and the Environment 11 (1):1-19.
Charles Wallis (1994). Representation and the Imperfect Ideal. Philosophy of Science 61 (3):407-28.
F. John Clendinnen (1992). Nomic Dependence and Causation. Philosophy of Science 59 (3):341-360.
Stan Godlovitch (1998). Things Change: So Whither Sustainability? Environmental Ethics 20 (3):291-304.
Joseph G. Moore (2008). A Modal Argument Against Vague Objects. Philosophers' Imprint 8 (12):1-17.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #131,747 of 722,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?