David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Vivarium 45 (1):69-92 (2007)
Giles of Rome, in his early treatise, De plurificatione possibilis intellectus, criticizes the arguments of Thomas Aquinas against the Averroist doctrine of the uniqueness of the possible intellect on the grounds that Aquinas does not fully appreciate the distinction between material and intentional forms and the differences in how these forms are generated. Nevertheless, like Aquinas, he argues that Averroes' doctrine still results in the apparently absurd consequence that homo non intelligit, i.e., the individual, particular man, this man, does not understand. Giles, however, attempts to respond to certain "radical" Averroists, who, in a bold and clever maneuver, affirm that homo non intelligit. While Giles does effectively argue that homo non intelligit is not the opinion of Averroes, he is unable to demonstrate the absurdity of homo non intelligit in a manner that would be convincing to the Averroists. This is because Giles, like Aquinas, maintains that the intellect is a power of the soul, and thus has a different conception of the relation between body and intellect than do the Averroists, who emphasize the separateness of the intellect.
|Keywords||AVERROES AVERROISM THOMAS AQUINAS INTELLECT GILES OF ROME|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard C. Taylor & Max Herrera (2005). Aquinas's Naturalized Epistemology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:85-102.
Gyula Klima (2009). Aquinas on the Materiality of the Human Soul and the Immateriality of the Human Intellect. Philosophical Investigations 32 (2):163-182.
Anthony Kenny (1969). Aquinas. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Anthony Kenny (1980). Aquinas. Hill and Wang.
P. S. Eardley (2006). The Foundations of Freedom in Later Medieval Philosophy: Giles of Rome and His Contemporaries. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):353-376.
John Giles Milhaven (1977). Thomas Aquinas on Sexual Pleasure. Journal of Religious Ethics 5 (2):157 - 181.
J. M. M. H. Thijssen (1997). 1277 Revisited: A New Interpretation of the Doctrinal Investigations of Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome. Vivarium 35 (1):72-101.
P. S. Eardley (2003). Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Will. Review of Metaphysics 56 (4):835 - 862.
Lorelle Lamascus (2006). Aquinas and Themistius on Intellect. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:255-273.
Mark D. Gossiaux (2003). Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Existence of God as Self-Evident. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):57-79.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads72 ( #55,647 of 1,789,801 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #54,567 of 1,789,801 )
How can I increase my downloads?