Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):59-110 (2004)
|Abstract||The aim of this essay is to emphasize a number of important points that will provide a better understanding of the history of philosophical thought concerning scientific knowledge. The main points made are: (a) that the principal way of viewing abstraction which has dominated the history of thought and epistemology up to the present is influenced by the original Aristotelian position; (b) that with the birth of modern science a new way of conceiving abstraction came into being which is better characterized by the term idealization, the name that was later, in fact, to be used by scientists to describe their scientific activity; (c) that, however, on account of the influence of empirical and inductive philosophy, scientists have often not had sufficient methodological awareness of this new way of viewing abstraction; (d) that this new concept of abstraction has frequently been expressed in the framework of philosophies that lie outside the mainstream of contemporary epistemology or even exhibit marked anti-scientific tendencies; (e) that the theme of idealization has been taken up again in the last few decades and a great contribution in this direction has been made by the so-called Pozna school of methodology.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joongol Kim (2011). A Strengthening of the Caesar Problem. Erkenntnis 75 (1):123-136.
Claire Ortiz Hill (2004). Abstraction and Idealization in Edmund Husserl and Georg Cantor Prior to 1895. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):217-244.
Martin R. Jones (2005). Idealization and Abstraction: A Framework. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 86 (1):173-218.
Menno Rol (2008). Idealization, Abstraction, and the Policy Relevance of Economic Theories. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (1):69-97.
Kit Fine (2002). The Limits of Abstraction. Oxford University Press.
Alisa Bokulich (2011). How Scientific Models Can Explain. Synthese 180 (1):33 - 45.
Neil Tennant (2004). A General Theory of Abstraction Operators. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):105-133.
Donato Rodriguez Xavier & Arroyo-Santos Alfonso (2012). The Structure of Idealization in Biological Theories: The Case of the Wright-Fisher Model. JOURNAL FOR GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE.
Demetris P. Portides (2005). A Theory of Scientific Model Construction: The Conceptual Process of Abstraction and Concretisation. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 10 (1):67-88.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #74,434 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?