David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Nursing Ethics 19 (6):810-818 (2012)
Gaining ethical clearance to conduct a study is an important aspect of all research involving humans but can be time-consuming and daunting for novice researchers. This article stems from a larger ethnographic study that examined research capacity building in Irish nursing and midwifery. Data were collected over a 28-month time frame from a purposive sample of 16 nurse or midwife research fellows who were funded to undertake full-time PhDs. Gaining ethical clearance for their studies was reported as an early ‘rite of passage’ in the category of ‘labouring the doctorate’. This article penetrates the complexities in Irish clinical research ethics by describing the practices these nurse and midwife researchers encountered and the experiences they had. The key issue of representation that occurred in the context of ‘medicalized’ research ethics is further explored including its meaning for nursing or midwifery research
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Geoffrey Poitras & Lindsay Meredith (2009). Ethical Transparency and Economic Medicalization. Journal of Business Ethics 86 (3):313 - 325.
Z. Sadler John, Simon Craddock Lee Fabrice Jotterand & Stephen Inrig (2009). Can Medicalization Be Good? Situating Medicalization Within Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (6).
Marion Danis (ed.) (2012). Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook. Oxford University Press.
Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Christine Grady (2006). Four Paradigms of Clinical Research and Research Oversight. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (01):82-96.
Solomon R. Benatar (2000). Avoiding Exploitation in Clinical Research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (4):562-565.
Eric Racine (2008). Enriching Our Views on Clinical Ethics: Results of a Qualitative Study of the Moral Psychology of Healthcare Ethics Committee Members. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (1):57-67.
Mark J. Hanson (1998). The Religious Difference in Clinical Healthcare. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (01):57-67.
Peter Singer, Edmund Pellegrino & Mark Siegler (2001). Clinical Ethics Revisited. BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-8.
David H. Brendel & Franklin G. Miller (2008). A Plea for Pragmatism in Clinical Research Ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24 – 31.
Jason H. T. Karlawish & John Lantos (1997). Community Equipoise and the Architecture of Clinical Research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (4):385-.
Eleanor Updale (2009). The Role of Clinical Ethics Committees. Diametros 22:116-123.
Kristine Bærøe & Ole Frithjof Norheim (2011). Mapping Out Structural Features in Clinical Care Calling for Ethical Sensitivity: A Theoretical Approach to Promote Ethical Competence in Healthcare Personnel and Clinical Ethical Support Services (Cess). Bioethics 25 (7):394-402.
Alan Wertheimer (2010). Rethinking the Ethics of Clinical Research: Widening the Lens. Oxford University Press.
Deborah Zion (2004). HIV/AIDS Clinical Research, and the Claims of Beneficence, Justice, and Integrity. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (04):404-413.
Edmund D. Pellegrino (1992). Beneficence, Scientific Autonomy, and Self-Interest: Ethical Dilemmas in Clinical Research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (04):361-.
Added to index2012-11-17
Total downloads2 ( #539,062 of 1,725,989 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,693 of 1,725,989 )
How can I increase my downloads?