Teaching Philosophy 35 (1):1-18 (2012)
|Abstract||The last two decades have seen a resurgence of interest in the study of classical Chinese texts by means of the subsequent commentaries. New versions of works like the Analects and Mencius that include selected commentaries have begun to appear, making some view about the value of commentaries necessary simply for picking which edition of a text to read. In this paper, I consider the potential role of the 2000-year-old commentarial tradition in the teaching and learning of Chinese philosophy. Given the difficulty of the original works, does the addition of commentaries make things better or worse from a student’s perspective? How far should we go in emphasizing the role of commentary in interacting with the texts?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Yuet Keung Lo (2008). Transmitters and Creators: Chinese Commentators and Commentaries on the Analects – by John Makeham. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35 (1):179–182.
Fang Zhao-hui & David R. Schiller (2002). A Critical Reflection on the Systematics of Traditional Chinese Learning. Philosophy East and West 52 (1):36-49.
Shuguang Zhang (2010). The Renaissance of Traditional Chinese Learning. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (2):237-254.
Christopher Kaczor (2004). Thomas Aquinas's Commentary on the Ethics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (3):353-378.
On-Cho Ng (2008). Introduction:The Yijing (《易經》) and its Commentaries. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35 (2):193-199.
Sten Ebbesen (2010). The Prior Analytics in the Latin West: 12th-13th Centuries. Vivarium 48 (1-2):96-133.
Sor-Hoon Tan (2011). The Dao of Politics: Li (Rituals/Rites) and Laws as Pragmatic Tools of Government. Philosophy East and West 61 (3):468-491.
Friederike Assandri (2012). Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings with Selections From Traditional Commentaries – By Brook Ziporyn. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39 (1):157-160.
Paul Fischer (2011). Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings, with Selections From Traditional Commentaries (Review). Philosophy East and West 61 (2):402-404.
Douglas E. Gerber (1988). Commentaries on Pindar W. J. Verdenius: Commentaries on Pindar, Vol. 1: Olympian Odes 3, 7, 12, 14. (Mnemosyne, Suppl. 97.) Pp. Xii+132. Leiden: Brill, 1987. Paper, Fl. 54. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 38 (02):203-205.
Averroës (2002). Averroës' Middle Commentary on Aristotle's De Anima: A Critical Edition of the Arabic Text. Brigham Young University Press.
Ping-Cheung Lo (2012). The Art of War Corpus and Chinese Just War Ethics Past and Present. Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (3):404-446.
Jeremy Bentham (1977). A Comment on the Commentaries and a Fragment on Government. Humanities Press.
Keimpe Algra (1991). Posidonius, the Fragments L. Edelstein, I. G. Kidd (Edd.): Posidonius, Vol. I: The Fragments. (Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries, 13.) Second Edition. Pp. Lvi + 344. Cambridge University Press, 1989. £50. I. G. Kidd: Posidonius, Vol. II: The Commentary, (I) Testimonia and Fragments 1–149; (Ii) Fragments 150–293. (Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries, 14A, 14B.) 2 Vols. Vol. I: Pp. Xii + 551; Vol. II: Pp. Vi + 505 (Numbered 553–1058). Cambridge University Press, 1988. £75. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (02):316-319.
M. L. West (1986). Two Hymns of Callimachus A. W. Bulloch: Callimachus. The Fifth Hymn. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. (Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries, 26.) Pp. Xviii + 264. Cambridge University Press, 1985. £32.50. N. Hopkinson: Callimachus. Hymn to Demeter. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. (Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries, 27.) Pp. Xix + 203. Cambridge University Press, 1984. £30. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 36 (01):27-31.
Added to index2011-09-28
Total downloads6 ( #145,547 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?