Les pères peuvent-ils se tromper? Saints, didascales et pères à Byzance sous les Paléologues

Chôra 6:51-58 (2008)
Towards the end of the Byzantine Empire many texts of the Latin Fathers were translated into Greek, beginning with the De Trinitate of Augustine. This flurry of translation spurred discussion on the authority of the Fathers. The Greeks were now confronted with the problem of what one should do when the (presumably infallible) Fathers justify apparent heresy (the Filioque) ? This question became crucial after the Council of Florence and the fall of the Byzantine Empire. What is the definition of a Father? A saint? A disciple? Is it possible to honour a Father and yet refuse to follow him on a particular point of doctrine?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/chora200864
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Marie-Helene Popelard (1993). Culture Artistique et Art Contemporain. Bulletin de la Société Américaine de Philosophie de Langue Française 5 (2/3):80-95.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

8 ( #276,615 of 1,726,564 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #147,216 of 1,726,564 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.