Meaning is Normative: A Response to Hattiangadi [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Analytica 27 (1):55-71 (2012)
Against a broad consensus within contemporary analytic philosophy, Hattiangadi (Mind and Language 21(2):220–240, 2006 , 2007 ) has recently argued that linguistic meaning is not normative, at least not in the sense of being prescriptive. She maintains, more specifically, that standard claims to the effect that meaning is normative are usually ambiguous between two readings: one, which she calls Prescriptivity , and another, which she calls Correctness . According to Hattiangadi, though meaning is normative in the uncontroversial sense specified in the principle Correctness , it is not normative in the sense specified by Prescriptivity . In this paper, I instead show that meaning is normative in the sense of being prescriptive. My argument for this claim takes the form of a classical disjunctive syllogism. I argue that either Correctness implies (because it presupposes) Prescriptivity , or linguistically meaningful items are ‘intrinsically intentional.’ But linguistically meaningful items are not intrinsically intentional, and thus Correctness implies (because it presupposes) Prescriptivity
|Keywords||Philosophy of language Wittgenstein Kripke Hattiangadi Semantic normativity Content skepticism Intentionality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Saul A. Kripke (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Harvard University Press.
Robert B. Brandom (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press.
John Henry McDowell (1998). Mind, Value, and Reality. Harvard University Press.
David Hume (1739/2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
Scott Soames (1999). Understanding Truth. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andrei Buleandra (2008). Normativity and Correctness: A Reply to Hattiangadi. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 23 (2):177-186.
John Fennell (2013). “The Meaning of 'Meaning is Normative' ”. Philosophical Investigations 36 (1):56-78.
Ralph Wedgwood (2009). The Normativity of the Intentional. In Ansgar Beckermann & Brian P. McLaughlin (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press
Anandi Hattiangadi (2006). Is Meaning Normative? Mind and Language 21 (2):220-240.
Daniel Whiting (2007). The Normativity of Meaning Defended. Analysis 67 (294):133–140.
George Pavlakos (2012). Correctness and Cognitivism. Remarks on Robert Alexy's Argument From the Claim to Correctness. Ratio Juris 25 (1):15-30.
Jaroslav Peregrin (2012). Inferentialism and the Normativity of Meaning. Philosophia 40 (1):75-97.
Aude Bandini (2011). Meaning and the Emergence of Normativity. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (3):415-431.
Anandi Hattiangadi (2007). Oughts and Thoughts: Rule-Following and the Normativity of Content. Oxford University Press.
Mark Norris Lance (1997). The Grammar of Meaning: Normativity and Semantic Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
David R. Mandel (2000). On the Meaning and Function of Normative Analysis: Conceptual Blur in the Rationality Debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):686-687.
Added to index2011-05-18
Total downloads56 ( #59,690 of 1,725,561 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #167,283 of 1,725,561 )
How can I increase my downloads?