Graduate studies at Western
Cognitive Science 35 (4):763-778 (2011)
|Abstract||Theories of embodied cognition hold that the conceptual system uses perceptual simulations for the purposes of representation. A strong prediction is that perceptual phenomena should emerge in conceptual processing, and, in support, previous research has shown that switching modalities from one trial to the next incurs a processing cost during conceptual tasks. However, to date, such research has been limited by its reliance on the retrieval of familiar concepts. We therefore examined concept creation by asking participants to interpret modality-specific compound phrases (i.e., conceptual combinations). Results show that modality switching costs emerge during the creation of new conceptual entities: People are slower to simulate a novel concept (e.g., auditory jingling onion) when their attention has already been engaged by a different modality in simulating a familiar concept (e.g., visual shiny penny). Furthermore, these costs cannot be accounted for by linguistic factors alone. Rather, our findings support the embodied view that concept creation, as well as retrieval, requires situated perceptual simulation|
|Keywords||Representation Embodied cognition Concepts Perceptual simulation Modality switching Conceptual combination|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Max Louwerse & Louise Connell (2011). A Taste of Words: Linguistic Context and Perceptual Simulation Predict the Modality of Words. Cognitive Science 35 (2):381-398.
Adina L. Roskies (2008). A New Argument for Nonconceptual Content. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (3):633–659.
Demian Whiting (2012). Are Emotions Perceptual Experiences of Value? Ratio 25 (1):93-107.
Georges Enderle (2009). A Rich Concept of Wealth Creation Beyond Profit Maximization and Adding Value. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (3):281 - 295.
Jeff Klooger (2011). From Nothing: Castoriadis and The Concept of Creation. Critical Horizons 12 (1):29-47.
Douglas L. Hintzman (1999). Retrieval Dynamics and Brain Mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):453-454.
Collin Rice (2013). Concept Empiricism, Content, and Compositionality. Philosophical Studies 162 (3):567-583.
K. Sathian (2004). Modality, Quo Vadis? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):413-414.
Charles Stinson (1973). The Finite Supernatural: Theological Perspectives. Religious Studies 9 (3):325 - 337.
Werner Ceusters (2011). Switching Partners: Dancing with the Ontological Engineers. In Thomas Batcherer & Roderick Coover (eds.), Switching Codes. Thinking through Digital Technology in the Humanities and the Arts. University of Chicago Press.
Lilli Alanen (1991). Descartes, Conceivability, and Logical Modality. In Tamara Horowitz (ed.), Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy. Rowman and Littlefield.
Casey O'Callaghan (forthcoming). Not All Perceptual Experience is Modality Specific. In Mohan Matthen, Dustin Stokes & Stephen Biggs (eds.), Perception and Its Modalities. Oxford.
Michael K. Shim (2006). Leibniz on Concept and Substance. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):309-325.
Lilli Alanen (1988). The Foundations of Modality and Conceivability in Descartes and His Predecessors. In Simo Knuuttila (ed.), Modern Modalities: Studies of the History of Modal Theories From Medieval Nominalism to Logical Positivism. Kluwer.
Mohan Matthen (2005). Visual Concepts. Philosophical Topics 33 (1):207-233.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-02-01
Total downloads1 ( #293,975 of 751,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?