Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (4):487-505 (2011)
|Abstract||A perspectivist theory is usually taken to mean that (1) our knowledge of the world is inevitably shaped by our particular perspectives, (2) any one of these perspectives is as good as any other, and (3) any claims to objective or authoritative knowledge are consequently without ground. Recent scholarship on Nietzsche, however, has challenged the prevalent view that the philosopher holds (2) and (3), arguing instead that his perspectivism aims at attaining a greater level of objectivity. In this essay, I attempt a structurally similar reinterpretation of Zhuangzi’s perspectivism. I argue that while the Chinese thinker sees all knowledge as perspective-dependent, he thinks that some perspectives are broader and more accurate than others. He utilizes shifts in perspective precisely in order to attain these superior perspectives, which constitute what he calls da zhi 大知, or “greater knowledge.” Whereas Nietzsche sees his perspectivism as methodologically continuous with the sciences, Zhuangzi’s “greater knowledge” has the goal of ensuring our survival and well-being in the everyday world|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
R. Lanier Anderson (1998). Truth and Objectivity in Perspectivism. Synthese 115 (1):1-32.
Brian Lightbody (2010). Nietzsche, Perspectivism, Anti-Realism: An Inconsistent Triad. The European Legacy 15 (4):425-438.
Ewing Y. Chinn (1997). Zhuangzi and Relativistic Scepticism. Asian Philosophy 7 (3):207 – 220.
Nick Trakakis (2006). Nietzsche's Perspectivism and Problems of Self-Refutation. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):91-110.
Steven D. Hales & Rex Welshon (2000). Nietzsche's Perspectivism. University of Illinois Press.
Mark E. Jonas & Yoshiaki M. Nakazawa (2008). Finding Truth in 'Lies': Nietzsche's Perspectivism and its Relation to Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (2):269-285.
Justin Marquis (2012). Contra Leiter's Anti-Skeptical Interpretation of Nietzsche's Perspectivism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):69-75.
Steven D. Hales & Rex Welshon (1994). Truth, Paradox, and Nietzschean Perspectivism. History of Philosophy Quarterly 11 (1):101-119.
James Peterman (2008). Why Zhuangzi's Real Discovery is One That Lets Him Stop Doing Philosophy When He Wants To. Philosophy East and West 58 (3):pp. 372-394.
Sven Bernecker (2006). Prospects for Epistemic Compatibilism. Philosophical Studies 130 (1):81-104.
Steven D. Hales & Rex Welshon (1999). Nietzsche, Perspectivism, and Mental Health. Philosophy, Psychiatry, Psychology 6 (3):173-177.
Deborah H. Soles & David E. Soles (1998). Fish Traps and Rabbit Snares: Zhuangzi on Judgement, Truth and Knowledge. Asian Philosophy 8 (3):149 – 164.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1984). Nietzsche's Sting and the Possibility of Good Philology. International Studies in Philosophy 16 (2):71-90.
Ronald N. Giere (2006). Scientific Perspectivism. University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2011-09-28
Total downloads18 ( #74,434 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?