Response to Montague
Consciousness and Cognition (forthcoming)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEdward N. Zalta (1988). A Comparison of Two Intensional Logics. Linguistics and Philosophy 11 (1):59-89.
Richard Montague (1974). Formal Philosophy; Selected Papers of Richard Montague. New Haven,Yale University Press.
Haroldo G. Hack, Aifredo L. González & Pedro J. Catuogno (1990). Una Semántica Computacional Dei Idioma Español Usando Las Teorías de R. Montague. Theoria 5 (1):171-191.
Ronnie Cann (1993). Formal Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Thaddeus Metz (2009). Censure Theory Still Best Accounts for Punishment of the Guilty: Reply to Montague. Philosophia 37 (1):113-23.
Michelle Montague (2007). Against Propositionalism. Noûs 41 (3):503–518.
Joyce Friedman & David S. Warren (1978). A Parsing Method for Montague Grammars. Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (3):347 - 372.
E. H. Alves & J. A. D. Guerzoni (1990). Extending Montague's System: A Three Valued Intensional Logic. Studia Logica 49 (1):127 - 132.
Reinhard Muskens (1996). Combining Montague Semantics and Discourse Representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (2):143 - 186.
Phillip Montague (2009). Revisiting the Censure Theory of Punishment. Philosophia 37 (1):125-131.
Roger Montague (1966). Is' to 'Ought. Analysis 26 (3):104 - 110.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-08-26Total downloads16 ( #74,618 of 549,011 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,011 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
