Philosophy of Science 74 (1):48-68 (2007)
|Abstract||In this paper, I develop Mauricio Suárez’s distinction between denotation, epistemic representation, and faithful epistemic representation. I then outline an interpretational account of epistemic representation, according to which a vehicle represents a target for a certain user if and only if the user adopts an interpretation of the vehicle in terms of the target, which would allow them to perform valid (but not necessarily sound) surrogative inferences from the model to the system. The main difference between the interpretational conception I defend here and Suárez’s inferential conception is that the interpretational account is a substantial account—interpretation is not just a “symptom” of representation; it is what makes something an epistemic representation of a something else.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Otávio Bueno (2006). Representation at the Nanoscale. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):617-628.
Steffen Ducheyne (2012). Scientific Representations as Limiting Cases. Erkenntnis 76 (1):73-89.
Chris Swoyer (1991). Structural Representation and Surrogative Reasoning. Synthese 87 (3):449 - 508.
Mauricio Suárez (2004). An Inferential Conception of Scientific Representation. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):767-779.
Steffen Ducheyne (2005). Lessons From Galileo: The Pragmatic Model of Shared Characteristics of Scientific Representation. Philosophia Naturalis 42 (2).
Gabriele Contessa (2007). Representing Reality: The Ontology of Scientific Models and Their Representational Function. Dissertation, University of London
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads108 ( #6,719 of 722,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #11,510 of 722,815 )
How can I increase my downloads?