The junk argument: safe disposal guidelines for mereological universalists

Analysis 72 (3):455-457 (2012)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Junk  Mereological Universalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/ans071
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,890
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A. J. Cotnoir (2014). Universalism and Junk. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (4):649-664.
David Sanson (2016). Worlds Enough for Junk. Res Philosophica 93 (1):1-18.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Lawrence A. Shapiro (1997). Junk Representations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):345-361.
David Sanson (2016). Worlds Enough for Junk. Res Philosophica 93 (1):1-18.
Donald Smith (2006). The Vagueness Argument for Mereological Universalism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3):357–368.
James Goetz (2006). The Extravagant Creator of Junk DNA. International Society for Complexity, Information, and Design Archive.
Michael C. Rea (1998). In Defense of Mereological Universalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2):347-360.
Donald Smith (2008). How to Endure an Alleged Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:285-292.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

180 ( #7,998 of 1,725,404 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

52 ( #21,826 of 1,725,404 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.