David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Theory 60 (3):325-340 (2010)
In this essay James Conroy raises the question of how far the state should engage in the rearing of children, looking in particular at homeschooling as a site for contestation. He considers this question by looking specifically at recent developments in the United Kingdom around the elision of child safeguarding issues with concern about the control of home education. In the first part of the essay, Conroy explores some general questions about the relation between politics and populism, and the consequences for the prerogatives of parents. In the second part of the essay, he interrogates constructivist accounts of the family and offers something of a historical corrective to the widely held view that the very conceit of the family is a “modern” invention. This analysis leads Conroy to conclude that, while states do have a proper locus in the upbringing of children, they must make certain presumptions in favor of the parent if governmental responses to home education are to be considered political rather than populist and “controlling.”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Philip Cook (2012). On the Duties of Shared Parenting. Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):168-181.
Rosalind Edwards & Val Gillies (2011). Clients or Consumers, Commonplace or Pioneers? Navigating the Contemporary Class Politics of Family, Parenting Skills and Education. Ethics and Education 6 (2):141-154.
Richard Smith (2011). On Dogs and Children: Judgements in the Realm of Meaning. Ethics and Education 6 (2):171-180.
Marti Anderson (2003). Our Growing Understanding of Subtle Energies and Their Function in the Evolving Universe. World Futures 59 (2):83 – 104.
Jeffry A. Simpson (1999). The Dual Selection Model: Questions About Necessity and Completeness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):235-235.
Paul Smeyers (2010). State Intervention and the Technologization and Regulation of Parenting. Educational Theory 60 (3):265-270.
Daniel Engster (2010). The Place of Parenting Within a Liberal Theory of Justice. Social Theory and Practice 36 (2):233-262.
Olga Pollatos, Eva Traut-Mattausch, Heike Schroeder & Rainer Schandry (2007). Interoceptive Awareness Mediates the Relationship Between Anxiety and the Intensity of Unpleasant Feelings. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 21 (7):931-943.
Carlos M. Vilas (1992). Latin American Populism: A Structural Approach. Science and Society 56 (4):389 - 420.
Claudia Card (1996). Against Marriage and Motherhood. Hypatia 11 (3):1 - 23.
Stéphane Vautier, Etienne Mullet & Sylvie Bourdet-Loubère (2003). The Instruction Set of Questionnaires Can Affect the Structure of the Data: Application to Self-Rated State Anxiety. Theory and Decision 54 (3):249-259.
Lisa Bortolotti & Daniela Cutas (2009). Reproductive and Parental Autonomy: An Argument for Compulsory Parental Education. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 19 (ethics suppl.):5-14.
Jean M. Tohill & Keith J. Holyoak (2000). The Impact of Anxiety on Analogical Reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 6 (1):27 – 40.
Jürgen Habermas (1986). The New Obscurity: The Crisis of the Welfare State and the Exhaustion of Utopian Energies: Translated by Phillip Jacobs. Philosophy and Social Criticism 11 (2):1-18.
Added to index2011-05-24
Total downloads8 ( #195,719 of 1,679,360 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #183,761 of 1,679,360 )
How can I increase my downloads?