Who is afraid of imaginary objects?
In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "On Denoting". Routledge (2009)
| Abstract | People often use expressions such as ‘Sherlock Holmes’ and ‘Pegasus’ that appear to refer to imaginary objects. In this paper, I consider the main attempts to account for apparent reference to imaginary objects available in the literature and argue that all fall short of being fully satisfactory. In particular, I consider the problems of two main options to maintain that imaginary objects are real and reference to them is genuine reference: possibilist and abstractist account. According to the former, imaginary objects are possible concrete objects. According to the latter, imaginary objects are actual abstract objects. I will then propose an account, the dualist account, which, I argue, combines the respective advantages of both accounts without sharing any of their respective disadvantages. According to this account, imaginary objects are not fully reducible to either abstract objects or possible objects: they are abstract artefacts that, in some contexts, stand for possible objects | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesG. Ryle, R. B. Braithwaite & G. E. Moore (1933). Symposium: Imaginary Objects. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 12:18 - 70.
E. J. Ashworth (1977). Chimeras and Imaginary Objects: A Study in the Post-Medieval Theory of Signification. Vivarium 15 (1):57-77.
Robert J. Deltete & Reed A. Guy (1996). Emerging From Imaginary Time. Synthese 108 (2):185 - 203.
Gabriele Contessa (2010). Scientific Models and Fictional Objects. Synthese 172 (2).
Marguerite la Caze (2002). The Analytic Imaginary. Cornell University Press.
Kathleen Lennon (2004). Imaginary Bodies and Worlds. Inquiry 47 (2):107 – 122.
Peter Inwagen (2002). “Carnap” and “the Polish Logician”. Acta Analytica 17 (1):7-17.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #123,092 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,722 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
