David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (1):59-78 (2003)
While there exist numerous applications of Kuhn's analysis of scientific revolutions to economics, there is yet to be an application to econometrics. The present paper addresses this via an analysis of the often-documented transition between the textbook and LSE methodologies witnessed in British time series econometrics. This exercise allows a number of issues to be raised. First, it will be questioned whether the observed transition in econometrics is an appropriate subject for analysis within the Kuhnian framework. This is the primary concern of the paper. Second, the adoption of Kuhn's approach will allow the witnessed transition in econometric methodology to be viewed from a different perspective to that permitted by more conventional historical accounts. This is seen to lead a number of interesting conclusions. Third, implications of the present study for Kuhn's analysis will be discussed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
George C. Davis (2005). Clarifying the 'Puzzle' Between the Textbook and LSE Approaches to Econometrics: A Comment on Cook's Kuhnian Perspective on Econometric Modelling. Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (1):93-115.
George C. Davis (2000). A Semantic Interpretation of Haavelmo's Structure of Econometrics. Economics and Philosophy 16 (2):205-228.
Steven Cook (2005). On the Semantic Approach to Econometric Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (1):117-123.
John Aldrich (2006). When Are Inferences Too Fragile to Be Believed? Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (2):161-177.
K. Brad Wray (2007). Kuhnian Revolutions Revisited. Synthese 158 (1):61-73.
Genaro Sucarrat (2010). Econometric Reduction Theory and Philosophy. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (1):53-75.
Kevin D. Hoover (1994). Econometrics as Observation: The Lucas Critique and the Nature of Econometric Inference. Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (1):65-80.
Mohammed H. I. Dore & J. Barkley Rosser, Do Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics Amount to a Kuhnian Paradigm Shift?
William Goodwin (2013). Structure and Scientific Controversies. Topoi 32 (1):101-110.
Steven Cook (1999). Methodological Aspects of the Encompassing Principle. Journal of Economic Methodology 6 (1):61-78.
Hsiang‐Ke Chao (2005). A Misconception of the Semantic Conception of Econometrics? Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (1):125-135.
Siobhain McGovern (1995). On a Maze of Second Thoughts and on the Methodology of Economic Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (2):223-238.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads5 ( #226,355 of 1,101,125 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,630 of 1,101,125 )
How can I increase my downloads?