A somewhat adverse reply to professor Goodman
Journal of Philosophy 55 (4):159-166 (1958)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBilly Joe Lucas (1997). The Second Epistemic Way Revisited: Reply to Professor Beard's, 'Professor Lucas on Omniscience'. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):143-162.
Morris Weitz (1971). Professor Goodman on the Aesthetic. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 29 (4):485-487.
Victor Lowe (1953). Professor Goodman's Concept of an Individual. Philosophical Review 62 (1):117-126.
Kenneth Small (1961). Professor Goodman's Puzzle. Philosophical Review 70 (4):544-552.
Jonathan D. Moreno (1981). Professor Goodman's Stories. Synthese 46 (3):355 - 358.
Phillip Cole (2002). Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne. Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
Robert Kowalenko (2012). Reply to Israel on the New Riddle of Induction. Philosophia 40 (3):549-552.
John C. Cooley (1957). Professor Goodman's Fact, Fiction, & Forecast. Journal of Philosophy 54 (10):293-311.
Nelson Goodman (1957). Reply to an Adverse Ally. Journal of Philosophy 54 (17):531-535.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #234,562 of 556,772 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
