Adequate understanding of inadequate ideas: Power and paradox in Spinoza's cognitive therapy
Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Spinoza shared with his contemporaries the conviction that the passions are, on the whole, unruly and destructive. A life of virtue requires that the passions be controlled, if not entirely vanquished, and the preferred means of imposing this control over the passions is via the power of reason. But there was little agreement in the seventeenth century about just what gives reason its strength and how its power can be brought to bear upon the wayward passions.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Valtteri Viljanen (2011). Spinoza's Geometry of Power. Cambridge University Press.
Firmin DeBrabander (2007/2008). Spinoza and the Stoics: Power, Politics and the Passions. Continuum.
Donald Rutherford (2008). Spinoza and the Dictates of Reason. Inquiry 51 (5):485 – 511.
Ron Williston (2003). The Epistemic Problem of Cartesian Passions. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):309-332.
Eva T. H. Brann (2008). Feeling Our Feelings: What Philosophers Think and People Know. Paul Dry Books.
Hasana Sharp (2007). The Force of Ideas in Spinoza. Political Theory 35 (6):732 - 755.
R. J. McShea (1969). Spinoza on Power. Inquiry 12 (1-4):133 – 143.
Colin Marshall (2012). Spinoza on Destroying Passions with Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):139-160.
Martin Lin (2006). Spinoza's Account of Akrasia. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):395-414.
Brandon C. Look (2007). Perfection, Power and the Passions in Spinoza and Leibniz. Revue Roumaine de la Philosophie 51 (1-2):21-38.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #25,904 of 738,317 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,317 )
How can I increase my downloads?