Bouwsma on Wittgenstein's philosophical method
Philosophical Investigations 31 (4):285-317 (2008)
| Abstract | It is argued that Wittgenstein was a greatly misunderstood philosopher, both as regards his own philosophical views and his ideas about philosophical method. O. K. Bouwsma's interpretation of Wittgenstein is used to illustrate the most common misunderstandings. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesChrysoula Gitsoulis, Wittgenstein and Surrealism. Essays in Philosophy.
David LaRocca (2007). Changing the Subject: The Auto/Biographical as the Philosophical in Wittgenstein. Epoché 12 (1):169-184.
John W. Cook (2004). The Undiscovered Wittgenstein: The Twentieth Century's Most Misunderstood Philosopher. Humanity Books.
David G. Stern (1994). Recent Work on Wittgenstein, 1980–1990. Synthese 98 (3):415-458.
Carl Hooper (2007). Koan Zen and Wittgenstein's Only Correct Method in Philosophy. Asian Philosophy 17 (3):283 – 292.
David G. Stern (1994). Recent Work on Wittgenstein, 1980-1990. [REVIEW] Synthese 98 (3):415 - 458.
John W. Cook (2000). Wittgenstein, Empiricism, and Language. Oxford University Press.
Chrysoula Gitsoulis (2007). The Moral Dimension of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Method. Analysis and Metaphysics (Special Issue on Wittgenstein) 6:452-467.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads48 ( #22,402 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,228 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
