Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Investigations 31 (4):285-317 (2008)
|Abstract||It is argued that Wittgenstein was a greatly misunderstood philosopher, both as regards his own philosophical views and his ideas about philosophical method. O. K. Bouwsma's interpretation of Wittgenstein is used to illustrate the most common misunderstandings.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Chrysoula Gitsoulis, Wittgenstein and Surrealism. Essays in Philosophy.
David LaRocca (2007). Changing the Subject: The Auto/Biographical as the Philosophical in Wittgenstein. Epoché 12 (1):169-184.
John W. Cook (2004). The Undiscovered Wittgenstein: The Twentieth Century's Most Misunderstood Philosopher. Humanity Books.
David G. Stern (1994). Recent Work on Wittgenstein, 1980–1990. [REVIEW] Synthese 98 (3):415-458.
Erich Ammereller & Eugen Fisher (eds.) (2004). Wittgenstein at Work: Method in the Philosophical Investigations. Routledge.
Carl Hooper (2007). Koan Zen and Wittgenstein's Only Correct Method in Philosophy. Asian Philosophy 17 (3):283 – 292.
David G. Stern (1994). Recent Work on Wittgenstein, 1980-1990. [REVIEW] Synthese 98 (3):415 - 458.
John W. Cook (2000). Wittgenstein, Empiricism, and Language. Oxford University Press.
Chrysoula Gitsoulis (2007). The Moral Dimension of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Method. Analysis and Metaphysics (Special Issue on Wittgenstein) 6:452-467.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #25,821 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?