Sept. 7, 2007 chrysippus on physical elements
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
My ultimate purpose here is to examine, discuss, and interpret a difficult excerpt in Stobaeus’ 5th c. AD anthology, alleging to report—uniquely, it appears—a distinction Chrysippus drew between three different applications of the term stoixe›on or element (i.e., physical element).1 Stobaeus lists this passage as giving opinions specifically of Chrysippus “about the elements out of substance” (per‹ t«n §k t∞w oÈs€aw stoixe€vn), though in holding them he says Chrysippus was following Zeno, the leader of his sect. Hermann Diels (1879) identified this selection as an excerpt (his fr. 21) from Arius Didymus’ late first century BC Epitome of Physical Doctrines.2 I print a translation below, with the text in an Appendix, as it is given in von Arnim (1903). The text is not without its problems, and I indicate in footnotes to the text which of the principal editors’ textual interventions I accept and follow in my translation. Whether this text presents a single, continuous excerpt from Arius Didymus, or instead some compilation of Stobaeus (or an earlier anthologist whose work Stobaeus employed) from dispersed passages of..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Author unknown, Chrysippus. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Serge Mouraviev (2005). Zeno's Cosmology and the Presumption of Innocence. Interpretations and Vindications. Phronesis 50 (3):232 - 249.
John M. Cooper (2009). Chrysippus on Physical Elements. In Ricardo Salles (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford University Press.
Michael Papazian (2012). Chrysippus Confronts the Liar: The Case for Stoic Cassationism. History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (3):197-214.
A. A. Long (1973). Chrysippus Josiah B. Gould: The Philosophy of Chrysippus. (Philosophia Antiqua, Xvii.) Pp. Vi+222. Leiden: Brill, 1970. Paper, Fl. 32. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 23 (02):214-216.
Christopher Gill (2005). Chrysippus on Psychology T. Tieleman: Chrysippus' On Affections. Reconstruction and Interpretation . (Philosophia Antiqua 94.) Pp. Xii + 346. Leiden: Brill, 2003. Cased. ISBN: 90-04-12998-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (02):449-.
Denis O'Brien (2000). Hermann Diels on the Presocratics: Empedocles' Double Destruction of the Cosmos ("Aetius" II 4.8). Phronesis 45 (1):1 - 18.
Denis O'Brien (2000). Hermann Diels on the Presocratics: Empedocles' Double Destruction of the Cosmos (Aetius Ii 4.8). Phronesis 45 (1):1-18.
Susanne Bobzien (2002). Chrysippus and the Epistemic Theory of Vagueness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (1):217-238.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #290,290 of 1,098,877 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?