From judgment to calculation

AI and Society 21 (4):395-409 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We only regard a system or a process as being “scientific” if it displays the three predominant characteristics of the natural sciences: predictability, repeatability and quantifiability. This by definition precludes intuition, subjective judgement, tacit knowledge, heuristics, dreams, etc. in other words, those attributes which are peculiarly human. Furthermore, this is resulting in a shift from judgment to calculation giving rise, in some cases, to an abject dependency on the machine and an inability to disagree with the outcome or even question it. To tolerate such a situation could be seen as an abdication of professional responsibility. In complex technological and scientific environments, it is sometimes said that those who make best use of computers already know what the answer is (in ball park terms) before the calculation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
31 (#503,056)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Cooley
Colorado State University

References found in this work

Machines with a purpose.H. H. Rosenbrock - 1990 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Tacit Knowing.Michael Polanyi - 1962 - Philosophy Today 6 (4):239.
Engineering as an art.H. H. Rosenbrock - 1988 - AI and Society 2 (4):315-320.
Engineering As An Art.H. H. Rosenbrock - 2007 - AI and Society 21 (4):673-678.

View all 9 references / Add more references