David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minds and Machines 3 (1):73-96 (1993)
It is widely mooted that a plausible computational cognitive model should involve both symbolic and connectionist components. However, sound principles for combining these components within a hybrid system are currently lacking; the design of such systems is oftenad hoc. In an attempt to ameliorate this we provide a framework of types of hybrid systems and constraints therein, within which to explore the issues. In particular, we suggest the use of system independent constraints, whose source lies in general considerations about cognitive systems, rather than in particular technological or task-based considerations. We illustrate this through a detailed examination of an interruptibility constraint: handling interruptions is a fundamental facet of cognition in a dynamic world. Aspects of interruptions are delineated, as are their precise expression in symbolic and connectionist systems. We illustrate the interaction of the various constraints from interruptibility in the different types of hybrid systems. The picture that emerges of the relationship between the connectionist and the symbolic within a hybrid system provides for sufficient flexibility and complexity to suggest interesting general implications for cognition, thus vindicating the utility of the framework.
|Keywords||Cognitive models interruptions hybrid systems connectionism symbolic systems constraints on hybrid systems|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jon Barwise & John Perry (1981). Situations and Attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 78 (11):668-691.
Andy Clark (1991). In Defense of Explicit Rules. In William Ramsey, Stephen P. Stich & D. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Andy Clark (1989). Microcognition. MIT Press.
Jerry Fodor (1983). Modularity of Mind. Mit Press.
John Hawthorne (1989). On the Compatibility of Connectionist and Classical Models. Philosophical Psychology 2 (1):5-16.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ronald N. Giere (2004). The Problem of Agency in Scienti?C Distributed Cognitive Systems. Journal of Cognition and Culture 4 (3-4):759-774.
Rineke Verbrugge, Gerard Renardel de Lavalette & Barteld Kooi, Hybrid Logics with Infinitary Proof Systems.
Kooi, Barteld, Renardel de Lavalette, Gerard & Verbrugge, Rineke, Hybrid Logics with Infinitary Proof Systems.
Ilkka Pyysiäinen (2003). Dual-Process Theories and Hybrid Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):617-618.
H. Kushida & M. Okada (2007). A Proof–Theoretic Study of the Correspondence of Hybrid Logic and Classical Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (1):35-61.
Robert L. Campbell, Mark H. Bickhard, PO Box & Chandler-Ullmann Hall, Types of Constraints on Development: An Interactivist Approach.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #297,594 of 1,102,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,475 of 1,102,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?