Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||• languages as sets of strings and early transformational grammar • interpreted languages as sets of string-meaning pairs • Montague in ‘Universal Grammar’: There is in my opinion no important theoretical diﬀerence between natural languages and the artiﬁcial languages of logicians; indeed I consider it possible to comprehend the syntax and semantics of both kinds of languages within a single natural and mathematically precise theory.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Jaroslav Peregrin (2008). Brandom’s Incompatibility Semantics. Philosophical Topics 36 (2):99-121.
Zoltán Gendler Szabó (2011). Bare Quantifiers. Philosophical Review 120 (2):247 - 283.
Barbara Abbott (2009). Part V. Back to Grice: Conditionals in English and Fopl. In Dingfang Shu & Ken Turner (eds.), Contrasting Meanings in Languages of the East and West. Peter Lang.
Tobias Kuhn (2013). A Principled Approach to Grammars for Controlled Natural Languages and Predictive Editors. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22 (1):33-70.
Martin Stokhof (2007). Hand or Hammer? On Formal and Natural Languages in Semantics. Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (5-6):597-626.
Patrick Suppes (1979). Logical Inference in English: A Preliminary Analysis. Studia Logica 38 (4):375 - 391.
Seth Cable (2013). Beyond the Past, Present, and Future: Towards the Semantics of 'Graded Tense' in Gĩkũyũ. [REVIEW] Natural Language Semantics 21 (3):219-276.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads19 ( #71,374 of 740,450 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,453 of 740,450 )
How can I increase my downloads?