David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (4):591-599 (2003)
A simultaneous collision that produces paradoxical indeterminism (involving N0 hypothetical particles in a classical three-dimensional Euclidean space) is described in Section 2. By showing that a similar paradox occurs with long-range forces between hypothetical particles, in Section 3, the underlying cause is seen to be that collections of such objects are assumed to have no intrinsic ordering. The resolution of allowing only finite numbers of particles is defended (as being the least ad hoc) by looking at both -sequences (in the context of a very basic supertask, in Section 4) and *-sequences (reversed -sequences, in the form of paradoxical results from the recent literature). Introduction The simultaneous collision The paradox in other contexts The basic problem is N0 things The recent literature Generating N0 things.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John D. Norton (1994). The Theory of Random Propositions. Erkenntnis 41 (3):325 - 352.
M. Adrian Carpentier (1968). Creative Sequences and Double Sequences. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 9 (1):35-61.
Wen-Fang Wang (2011). Theories of Abstract Objects Without Ad Hoc Restriction. Erkenntnis 74 (1):1-15.
V. Michele Abrusci, Jean-Yves Girard & Jacques Van De Wiele (1990). Some Uses of Dilators in Combinatorial Problems. II. Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (1):32-40.
Feng Shi & Zhongxi Mo (2002). Similarity Among Nucleotides Sequences. Acta Biotheoretica 50 (2):95-99.
Wolfgang Merkle (2003). The Kolmogorov-Loveland Stochastic Sequences Are Not Closed Under Selecting Subsequences. Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (4):1362-1376.
H. C. M. de Swart (1992). Spreads or Choice Sequences? History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (2):203-213.
Joan Rand Moschovakis (1987). Relative Lawlessness in Intuitionistic Analysis. Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (1):68-88.
C. P. Schnorr & P. Fuchs (1977). General Random Sequences and Learnable Sequences. Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 (3):329-340.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #441,289 of 1,911,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #459,829 of 1,911,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?