|Abstract||It has been alleged that Carolus Linnaeus practised Eurocentrism, sexism and racism in naming plant genera after famous botanists, and excluding ‘barbarous names’. He has therefore been said to practise ‘linguistic imperialism’. This paper examines whether Linnaeus applied ‘linguistic imperialism’ to the naming of Chinese plants. On the basis of examples such as Thea (¼Camellia), Urena, Basella, Annona, Sapindus (¼Koelreuteria), and Panax, I conclude that Linnaeus used generic names of diverse origins. However, he misidentiﬁed Chinese plants’ habitats, and acted on these misapprehensions.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
P. M. (2001). Cain on Linnaeus: The Scientist-Historian as Unanalysed Entity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (2):239-254.
William Scott Ferguson (1963). Greek Imperialism. New York, Biblo and Tannen.
Matthew Hall (2009). Plant Autonomy and Human-Plant Ethics. Environmental Ethics 31 (2):169-181.
Amber D. Carpenter (2011). Embodied Intelligent (?) Souls: Plants in Platos Timaeus. Phronesis 55 (4):281-303.
Russell Hatton (1987). Chinese Philosophy or Chinese "Philosophy"? Linguistic Analysis and the Chinese Philosophical Tradition, Again. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 14 (4):445-473.
Ian James Kidd (forthcoming). Historical Contingency and the Impact of Scientific Imperialism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science.
Sara T. Scharf (2009). Identification Keys, the "Natural Method," and the Development of Plant Identification Manuals. Journal of the History of Biology 42 (1):73 - 117.
Staffan Müller-Wille & Karen Reeds (2007). A Translation of Carl Linnaeus's Introduction to Genera Plantarum (1737). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (3):563-572.
Michael Marder (2012). The Life of Plants and the Limits of Empathy. Dialogue 51 (2):259-273.
Peter Harrison (2009). Linnaeus as a Second Adam? Taxonomy and the Religious Vocation. Zygon 44 (4):879-893.
John Takman (1957). Notes on Linnaeus. Science and Society 21 (3):193 - 209.
Mary M. Garrett (1997). Chinese Buddhist Religious Disputation. Argumentation 11 (2):195-209.
Sven E. O. Hort (ed.) (2010). From Linnaeus to the Future(S): Letters From Afar. Linnaeus University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads1 ( #291,125 of 722,764 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,764 )
How can I increase my downloads?