David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (6):517-544 (2004)
In one study funded by the United States Department of Agriculture, people from North Dakota were interviewed to discover which moral principles they use in evaluating the morality of transgenic organisms and their introduction into markets. It was found that although the moral codes the human subjects employed were very similar, their views on transgenics were vastly different. In this paper, the codes that were used by the respondents are developed, compared to that of the academically composed Belmont Report, and then modified to create the more practical Common Moral Code. At the end, it is shown that the Common Moral Code has inherent inconsistency flaws that might be resolvable, but would require extensive work on the definition of terms and principles. However, the effort is worthwhile, especially if it results in a common moral code that all those involved in the debate are willing to use in negotiating a resolution to their differences.
|Keywords||Belmont report GMO moral code moral principle practical morality transgenic organisms|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
James Rachels (1986). The Elements of Moral Philosophy. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Tom L. Beauchamp & Leroy Walters (1982). Contemporary Issues in Bioethics. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Michael Jonathan Reiss & Roger Straughan (2000). [Book Review] Improving Nature?, The Science and Ethics of Genetic Engineering. [REVIEW] Hastings Center Report 30 (2):41-43.
Ben Mepham (2000). ``Würde der Kreatur'' and the Common Morality. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):65-78.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jean Pettifor, Janel Gauthier & Andrea Ferrero (2011). The Universal Declaration of Ethical Principles for Psychologists: A Culture-Sensitive Model for Creating and Reviewing a Code of Ethics. Ethics and Behavior 20 (3):179-196.
Effy Oz (1993). Ethical Standards for Computer Professionals: A Comparative Analysis of Four Major Codes. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (9):709 - 726.
Karim Jamal & Norman E. Bowie (1995). Theoretical Considerations for a Meaningful Code of Professional Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):703 - 714.
Nicola Higgs-Kleyn & Dimitri Kapelianis (1999). The Role of Professional Codes in Regarding Ethical Conduct. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (4):363 - 374.
Muel Kaptein (2004). Business codes of multinational firms: What do they say? Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1):13-31.
Christian Hick (1998). Codes and Morals: Is There a Missing Link? (The Nuremberg Code Revisited). [REVIEW] Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 1 (2):143-154.
Mark S. Schwartz (2002). A Code of Ethics for Corporatecode of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 41 (1-2):27 - 43.
Mark S. Schwartz (2005). Universal Moral Values for Corporate Codes of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 59 (1-2):27 - 44.
D. R. Cooley & Gary Goreham (2004). Are Transgenic Organisms Unnatural? Ethics and the Environment 9 (1):46-55.
Jacquie L'Etang (1992). A Kantian Approach to Codes of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (10):737 - 744.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #381,445 of 1,793,156 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #280,900 of 1,793,156 )
How can I increase my downloads?