David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2):1-29 (2003)
As it is currently understood, the notion of autonomy, both as something that belongs to human beings and human nature, as such, and also as the source or basis of morality , is bound up inextricably with the philosophy of Kant. The term “autonomy” itself derives from classical Greek, where it was applied primarily or even exclusively in a political context, to civic communities possessing independent legislative and self-governing authority. The term was taken up again in Renaissance and early modern times with similar political applications, but was applied also in ecclesiastical disputes about the independence of reformed churches from the former authority in religious matters of the church of the Roman popes. Kant's innovation consisted in conceiving of individual rational persons, as such, as lawgivers or legislators to themselves, and to all rational beings , for their individual modes of behavior. For Kant, rational beings possess a power of legislating for themselves individually, according to which they each set their own personal ends and subject that selection, and their pursuit of the ends in question, to a universal principle, which is expressed in Kant's categorical imperative. The categorical imperative requires that one set one's own ends only within a framework that would warrant acceptance by all other such beings
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Sellars (2012). Stoics Against Stoics In Cudworth's A Treatise of Freewill. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):935-952.
John M. Rist (1969). Stoic Philosophy. London, Cambridge U.P..
Christoph Jedan (2009). Stoic Virtues: Chrysippus and the Religious Character of Stoic Ethics. Continuum.
Daniel Nolan (2006). Stoic Gunk. Phronesis 51 (2):162 - 183.
Sheila McLean (2010). Autonomy, Consent and the Law. Routledge-Cavendish.
David Zimmerman (2000). Making Do: Troubling Stoic Tendencies in an Otherwise Compelling Theory of Autonomy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):25-53.
William Stephens (2012). The Ideal of the Stoic Sportsman. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 31 (2):196-211.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #73,020 of 1,902,212 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #167,618 of 1,902,212 )
How can I increase my downloads?